Hybrid simulation system for autonomous vehicles

ABSTRACT

Techniques are disclosed for performing hybrid simulation operations with an autonomous vehicle. A method of testing autonomous vehicle operations includes receiving, by a computer, a pre-configured scenario that includes one or more simulation parameters and one or more initial condition parameters, sending, to the autonomous vehicle and based on the one or more initial condition parameters, control signals that instruct the autonomous vehicle to operate at an operative condition, and in response to determining that the autonomous vehicle is operating at the operative condition, performing a simulation with the one or more simulated objects and the autonomous vehicle to test a response of the autonomous vehicle.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.16/428,805, titled “HYBRID SIMULATION SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES,”filed May 31, 2019, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated byreference herein.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This document relates to techniques to perform simulations on anautonomous vehicle.

BACKGROUND

A vehicle may include sensors for several purposes. For example, sensorsmay be attached to the front and rear bumpers of a car to provideaudible and/or visual cues to the driver to indicate a proximity of anobject to the car. In another example, sensors may be installed on aroof of a vehicle to facilitate autonomous driving. Sensors can obtaindata related to one or more areas that surround a vehicle. The sensordata can be processed to obtain information about the road or about theobjects surrounding the autonomous vehicle. Thus, the sensor dataobtained from the sensors on an autonomous vehicle can be used to safelymaneuver the autonomous vehicle through traffic or on a highway.

SUMMARY

A hybrid simulation system includes a vehicle simulation computeroperating in an autonomous vehicle to test the operations and/orperformance of the autonomous vehicle under pre-configured scenarios.The hybrid simulation system can allow a user to test an autonomousvehicle by running a pre-configured scenario on an actual autonomousvehicle that can operate in a test facility in the real-world.

In an exemplary embodiment, a method enables testing of autonomousvehicle operations. The method includes receiving, by a computer, apre-configured scenario that includes: one or more simulation parametersthat indicate presence of one or more simulated objects in anenvironment that includes an autonomous vehicle, and one or more initialcondition parameters that indicate an operative condition in which theautonomous vehicle is to be operated when a simulation is performed totest the autonomous vehicle. The method includes sending, to theautonomous vehicle and based on the one or more initial conditionparameters, control signals that instruct the autonomous vehicle tooperate at the operative condition. The method also includes in responseto determining, by the computer, that the autonomous vehicle isoperating at the operative condition: performing, based on the one ormore simulation parameters, the simulation with the one or moresimulated objects and the autonomous vehicle; receiving, from theautonomous vehicle, a status information that indicates a response ofthe autonomous vehicle to the simulation with one or more simulatedobjects; and determining that the autonomous vehicle passed thesimulation based on a comparison of the response of the autonomousvehicle to an expected response of the autonomous vehicle.

In some embodiments, the computer determines that the autonomous vehicleis operating at the operative condition by: receiving, from theautonomous vehicle, another status information that indicates a currentdriving condition of the autonomous vehicle; and determining that thatthe current driving condition is same as the operative condition. Insome embodiments, the method further comprises resending the controlsignals to the autonomous vehicle in response to determining that theautonomous vehicle is not operating at the operative condition.

In some embodiments, the one or more simulation parameters that indicatepresence of the one or more simulated objects include a first set of oneor more locations of one or more vehicles or a second set of one or morelocations of one or more pedestrians. In some embodiments, the one ormore initial condition parameters include a position, a rotation, aspeed, or an acceleration of the autonomous vehicle. In someembodiments, the control signals include a steering angle that controlsan amount of steering of the autonomous vehicle, a throttle value thatcontrols a speed of the autonomous vehicle, a brake value to control anamount of braking engaged by the autonomous vehicle, a clutch indicationto press or release the clutch of the autonomous vehicle, or a gearshifting information to switch engine gears of the autonomous vehicle.In some embodiments, the autonomous vehicle is a semi-trailer truck.

In yet another exemplary aspect, the above-described method is embodiedin the form of processor-executable code and stored in acomputer-readable program medium. A computer readable program storagemedium can have code stored thereon, where the code, when executed by aprocessor, causes the processor to implement the methods described inthis patent document.

In yet another exemplary embodiment, a device or apparatus that isconfigured or operable to perform the above-described methods isdisclosed.

In yet another exemplary aspect, a system for testing autonomous vehicleoperation is described. The system includes an autonomous vehicle and acomputer that includes a processor and a memory that storesinstructions. The instruction when executed by the processor, causes theprocessor to implement the methods described in this patent document.

The above and other aspects and their implementations are described ingreater detail in the drawings, the descriptions, and the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an exemplary hybrid simulation system.

FIG. 2 shows an exemplary flow diagram of operations performed by atrigger controller module of a vehicle simulation computer.

FIG. 3 shows an exemplary flow diagram for testing autonomous vehicleoperations.

FIG. 4 shows an exemplary block diagram of a vehicle simulationcomputer.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A driving system operating in an autonomous vehicle is a complex systemthat involves not only hardware but also software. The software systemoperating in an autonomous vehicle includes algorithm modules that canperform various autonomous driving related operations based oninformation obtained from the hardware on the autonomous vehicle. Forexample, a perception algorithm module can detect vehicle and/or objectslocated around the autonomous vehicle based on data obtained fromsensors located on the autonomous vehicle. In another example, a controlalgorithm module can control the driving operation of the autonomousvehicle in response to the information generated by the perceptionmodule. The integration of hardware and software should be tested undervarious scenarios to determine that the overall autonomous drivingsystem performs safely under various scenarios.

A conventional simulation system includes a computer that executes asimulation to test an autonomous vehicle's software system. Theconventional simulation computer provides mock sensor information to theautonomous vehicle's software system that is also operated on thesimulation computer. Based on the mock sensor information, the softwaresystem's algorithm modules can generate output(s) that can be analyzedby the conventional simulation computer. The outputs obtained by theconventional simulation system can be used to simulate the processupdating the status of the autonomous vehicle and/or other objects thatsurround the autonomous vehicle without actually using an autonomousvehicle. Thus, conventional simulation systems simulate the operationsand/or performance of an autonomous vehicle without actually using anautonomous vehicle.

A conventional simulation system has several drawbacks. A conventionalsimulation system simulates in software the operations of the autonomousvehicle. However, the performance of an autonomous vehicle's hardwaredevice can be difficult to simulate at least because the performance ofthe autonomous vehicle in response to control signals (e.g., steering,throttle) can be difficult to predict. Thus, in some cases, aconventional simulation system can indicate that an autonomous vehicle'ssoftware system yields acceptable performance only to fail in areal-world scenario. Such cases can happen frequently where anautonomous vehicle is a semi-trailer truck that includes a complexhardware and/or mechanical system.

An exemplary hybrid simulation system is described in this patentdocument that includes a vehicle simulation computer operating in anautonomous vehicle to test the operations and/or performance of theautonomous vehicle under pre-configured scenarios. Unlike conventionalsimulation systems, the hybrid simulation system allows a user to testthe autonomous vehicle by running a pre-configured scenario on an actualautonomous vehicle that can operate in a test facility in thereal-world. The pre-configured scenario can simulate an environment thatsurrounds the actual autonomous vehicle (e.g., other simulated vehicleslocated at a pre-determined distance from the autonomous vehicle) sothat the autonomous vehicle can actually respond to the simulatedpre-configured scenario. Thus, the exemplary hybrid simulation systemcan allow an actual or real autonomous vehicle to be tested on a road ona test site.

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an exemplary hybrid simulation system100. The hybrid simulation system includes an actual or real autonomousvehicle 120 and a vehicle simulation computer 102 that can be located inthe autonomous vehicle 120. The vehicle simulation computer 102 canperform hybrid simulation related operations in two phases. In phase 1,a trigger controller module 106 of the vehicle simulation computer 102loads or retrieves a pre-configured scenario from a plurality ofpre-configured scenarios stored on a scenario database 104.

A pre-configured scenario may have one or more initial conditionparameters that indicate an initial condition of the autonomous vehicle120, one or more simulation parameters that indicate of a presence ofone or more simulated objects (e.g., another vehicle, pedestrian, etc.)in an environment surrounding the autonomous vehicle 120, and/or one ormore expected output from the autonomous vehicle 120 to verify theperformance of the autonomous vehicle 120. An initial condition of theautonomous vehicle 120 describes an operating condition or a drivingcondition of the autonomous vehicle 120 when a simulated test is to beperformed. The initial condition can describe a detailed physical statusof the autonomous vehicle 120. For example, the initial condition in apre-configured scenario may describe the position, rotation, speed(linear and/or angular), and/or acceleration of the autonomous vehicle120. In some embodiments, a pre-configured scenario may includeparameters to test an acceleration and/or deceleration of the autonomousvehicle or it may include parameters to test the steering of theautonomous vehicle.

In some embodiments, a pre-configured scenario may not include one ormore simulation parameters that indicate of a presence of one or moresimulated objects around the autonomous vehicle 120 so that thepre-configured scenario can test only a performance of the autonomousvehicle 120. For example, a pre-configured scenario may include apre-defined trajectory of the autonomous vehicle and the triggercontroller module 106 and/or vehicle software system module 110 (asfurther described in this patent document) can receive the trajectory asinput and then send to the autonomous vehicle 120 control signals (e.g.,throttle information, brake amount information and/or steering angleinformation). By testing the autonomous vehicle 120 without othersimulated vehicles, vehicle simulation computer 102 can test theresponse of the autonomous vehicle's hardware. Thus, the hardware of theautonomous vehicle 120 may be validated so that the autonomous vehicle120 can be deployed in the real world. In some embodiments, apre-configured scenario may include faults (e.g., audible indicator toindicate a detected emergency vehicle) to train a driver to take controlof the autonomous vehicle.

After the trigger controller module 106 receives the pre-configuredscenario, the trigger controller module 106 can start the autonomousvehicle 120 and can send control signal(s) 112 to the autonomous vehicleso that the autonomous vehicle can reach an initial condition or canoperate at an initial condition as described in the pre-configuredscenario. Some examples of control signal(s) 112 to control theautonomous vehicle 120 can include a steering angle that controls anamount of steering of the autonomous vehicle, a throttle value thatcontrols a speed or acceleration of the autonomous vehicle, a brakevalue to control an amount of braking or deceleration engaged by theautonomous vehicle, a clutch indication to press or release the clutchof the autonomous vehicle, and/or a gear shifting information to switchengine gears of the autonomous vehicle.

The trigger controller module 106 can perform a closed loop operation todetermine whether the autonomous vehicle 120 has reached an initialcondition in the pre-configured scenario. For example, a pre-configuredscenario may be designed to have an initial condition where theautonomous vehicle 210 reach a speed of 10 mph after which a simulatedcar located 50 meters in front of the autonomous vehicle 120 is stopped.In this example, the trigger controller module 106 can start theautonomous vehicle 120 and can provide control signal(s) 112 such asdisengaging brakes, increasing throttle, engaging clutch, and/orshifting gears. The trigger controller module 106 can also receivevehicle status information 114 (e.g., current speed and/orlocation/position) from the autonomous vehicle 120 to determine whetherthe control signal(s) 112 need to be adjusted or maintained.

The trigger controller module 106 can also receive the vehicle statusinformation 114 to determine whether the autonomous vehicle 120 hasreached the initial condition of the pre-configured scenario. Forexample, if the initial condition states that the autonomous vehicleshould operate at 25 mph to perform a simulation, the trigger controllermodule 106 can receive the vehicle status information which includes thecurrent speed of the and compares the current speed to the target speedof the initial condition to resend the control signal 112. In someembodiments, if the current speed is 10 mph, then the trigger controllermodule can determine the amount of throttle needed to reach 25 mph andthe trigger controller module can send the updated throttle amount tothe autonomous vehicle 120 as part of an updated resent control signal112.

After the trigger controller module 106 determines that the autonomousvehicle 120 has reached an initial condition, the trigger controllermodule 106 sends a trigger signal to a simulation module 108 that canperform operations under phase 2. In this patent document, the terms“phase 1” and “phase 2” are used to describe separate operationsperformed by different modules of the vehicle simulation computer 102.Unless otherwise mentioned in this patent document, the terms “phase 1”and “phase 2” do not imply an order of operations between the differentmodules of the vehicle simulation computer 102. In some embodiments, theoperations related to phase 2 can be performed before or with theoperations performed by the trigger controller module 106 and/orscenario database 104 in phase 1.

In phase 2, the vehicle simulation computer 102 can operate thesimulation module 108 and the vehicle software system module 110. Thesimulation module 108 provides simulated data to the vehicle softwaresystem module 110. Simulated data can include simulation parameter(s)about simulated object(s) located around the autonomous vehicle 120 thatcan be used to test the autonomous vehicle's performance. Simulated datacan also include configurations about how other simulated objects move(e.g., the position, rotation and/or velocity of other objects) aftersimulation starts. As an example, the simulation parameters can includepositions of simulated vehicles located and/or driven around theautonomous vehicle 120. In another example, a simulation parameter caninclude a simulated vehicle located on an on-ramp of a highway that willmerge onto a lane where the autonomous vehicle 120 is being driven. Insome embodiments, the simulation module 108 can obtain the simulationparameters about objects located around the autonomous vehicle 120 fromthe pre-configured scenario that the trigger controller module 106receives from the scenario database 104. The simulated dataconfigurations can be sent to the simulation module 108 by triggercontroller module 106, where the trigger controller module 106 receivessuch information them from scenario database 104.

The simulation module 108 receives as an input vehicle statusinformation 118 (e.g., current speed and/or location/position) from theautonomous vehicle 120. The simulation module 108 can transform thevehicle status information 118 to simulation environment. For example, apre-configured scenario can indicate an initial condition of theautonomous vehicle and how other simulated objects may move around theautonomous vehicle 120. The initial condition may include a position ofthe autonomous vehicle 120. For example, a pre-configured scenario mayinclude an initial condition where an autonomous vehicle 120 is beingdriven on a highway on ramp on Interstate 10 (I-10 freeway). However, abenefit of the exemplary hybrid simulation system is that the autonomousvehicle 120 need not be driven on the I-10 freeway to test thepre-configured scenario.

In the hybrid simulation system, the autonomous vehicle 120 can betested in a test facility anywhere in the real-world. For example, theautonomous vehicle 120 can be tested in a test facility in the State ofMontana, which is located far from the I-10 freeway. In this example,the vehicle status information 118 may send global positioning system(GPS) data to the simulation module 108 that indicates that theautonomous vehicle 120 is located within Montana. The simulation module108 can transform the vehicle status information 118 (e.g., GPS data) tochange the position and/or rotation information to a location of an onramp on the I-10 freeway. The simulation module 108 may perform acoordinate transformation to change the GPS data. For example, asimulation module 108 may calculate a coordinate transformation matrixby using the position of the autonomous vehicle described in the initialcondition and the GPS data obtained at the beginning of phase 2.

The vehicle status information 118 received by the simulation module 108can also indicate a response of the autonomous vehicle 120 to thesimulation parameter(s). For example, if a simulation parameterindicates that a simulated vehicle located 80 meters in front of theautonomous vehicle 120 has stopped, then the vehicle status information118 can indicate to the simulation module 108 that the autonomousvehicle has engaged its brakes to stop prior to reaching the simulatedvehicle. The pre-configured scenario also includes the expectedperformance metrics for the autonomous vehicle 120. The expectedperformance metric can include the status information provided by theautonomous vehicle 120. For example, a pre-configured scenario'sexpected performance metric may state that when the autonomous vehiclestops it should not more than a pre-determined distance (e.g., 20 feet)from another simulated vehicle in front of the autonomous vehicle 120.Thus, the pre-configured scenario can include an expected performancemetric or an expected output or an expected response from an autonomousvehicle to compare the actual response of the autonomous vehicle 120 ina simulation.

Continuing with the first of the two examples provided above, anexpected response in the first pre-configured scenario can include abraking indicator that is set to a value (e.g., a brake flag set to avalue “1”) that indicates that the autonomous vehicle should engage itsbrakes. If the autonomous vehicle 120 brakes, it can send the vehiclestatus information 118 that includes the braking indicator value (e.g.,value of “1”). The simulation module 108 can compare the expectedbreaking parameter in the expected output to the actual breakingindicator value received in the vehicle status information 118. If thesimulation module 108 determines that the expected response from theautonomous vehicle 120 matches or is the same as an expected output,then the simulation module 108 can determine that the autonomous vehicle120 has passed the simulation because the autonomous vehicle 120 hasperformed a correct operation in response to a simulation performed onthe autonomous vehicle 120.

In the second of the two examples provided above, an expectedperformance metric in the second pre-configured scenario can include adistance measured by the autonomous vehicle 120 between the autonomousvehicle 120 and the simulated vehicle in front of the autonomous vehicle120. In some embodiments, the simulation module 108 can determine thatthe autonomous vehicle 120 has passed a simulation if the simulationmodule 108 determines that an actual response value received from theautonomous vehicle 120 is within a range of expected response valuesprovided by the pre-configured scenario. In some embodiments, thesimulation module 108 can determine that the autonomous vehicle 120 haspassed a simulation if the simulation module 108 determines that anactual response value received from the autonomous vehicle 120 isgreater than an expected response value.

On the other hand, if the simulation module 108 determines that theexpected response from the autonomous vehicle 120 does not matches theexpected output or is not the same as the expected output, or is notwithin a range of expected response values, then the simulation module108 can determine that the autonomous vehicle 120 has failed thesimulation.

The vehicle software system module 110 includes the software code thatcan operate the autonomous vehicle 120. For example, the vehiclesoftware system module 110 can include a perception algorithm module anda control algorithm module. The perception algorithm module candetermine the presence of vehicle and/or objects located around theautonomous vehicle 120 based on the simulated data provided by thesimulation module 108. The control algorithm module can control thedriving operation of the autonomous vehicle in response to theinformation generated by the perception module. Thus, for example, thecontrol algorithm module can generate and provide the control signal(s)116 to operate the autonomous vehicle 120. The information included inthe control signal(s) 116 may be the same as the information included inthe control signal(s) 112 sent by the trigger controller module 106.

The hybrid simulation system 100 can be considered an augmented realitysystem, where the autonomous vehicle 120 is operating or being driven inthe real-world, and where the software operating on the vehiclesimulation computer 102 simulates scenarios to test the performance oroperation of the autonomous vehicle 120. Continuing with the exampledescribed above, a simulation module 108 may simulate a presence of astopped car 50 meters in front of the autonomous vehicle 120 so that thevehicle software system module 110 can perform operations to decelerateand stop the autonomous vehicle 110 in response to determining thepresence of the stopped car. The autonomous vehicle 120 can be locatedin an empty test facility but can perform its operations as if it wereoperating in the real-world. Thus, a benefit of the hybrid simulationsystem 100 is that it can safely simulate scenarios to test theoperations and/or performance of the autonomous vehicle 120. Anotherbenefit of the hybrid simulation system 100 is that it can test both thesoftware system and the hardware system operating on an autonomousvehicle 120. Yet another benefit of the hybrid simulation system 100 isthat it can be performed during an integration process to test newautonomous vehicles to determine whether the new autonomous vehicles areready for operation in the real-world. Finally, another benefit of thehybrid simulation system 100 is that it can allow engineers to fine tunethe hardware and/or software for the autonomous vehicle in response toperforming the hybrid simulation.

FIG. 2 shows an exemplary flow diagram of operations performed by atrigger controller module of a vehicle simulation computer. At the startoperation 202, a vehicle simulation computer receives an indication viaa graphical user interface (GUI) that a user has initiated a simulation.The indication can include a pre-configured scenario selected by theuser for the simulation. At the initialize operation 204, the vehiclesimulation computer retrieves or receives the selected pre-configuredscenario from the scenario database. From the pre-configured scenario,the vehicle simulation computer can determine an initial condition ofthe autonomous vehicle.

At the receiving operation 205, the vehicle simulation computer requestsand/or receives the current vehicle status information from theautonomous vehicle so that the vehicle simulation computer can performthe determining operation 206 based on the latest status of theautonomous vehicle. After the receiving operation 205, the vehiclesimulation computer performs the determining operation 206 where thevehicle simulation computer determines whether the autonomous vehiclehas reached the initial condition specified by the selectedpre-configured scenario. At the determining operation 206, if thevehicle simulation computer determines that the autonomous vehicle hasreached the initial condition, then the trigger controller module of thevehicle simulation computer can generate and/or send a trigger signal tothe simulation module to performs operations associated with phase 2 ofthe simulation process.

At the determining operation 206, if the vehicle simulation computerdetermines that the autonomous vehicle has not reached the initialcondition, then the vehicle simulation computer performs the sendingoperation 210. At the sending operation 210, the vehicle simulationcomputer determines value(s) for control signal(s) that need to be sentto the autonomous vehicle to have the autonomous vehicle operate at theinitial condition. The control signal(s) value(s) can be determined bythe vehicle simulation computer by comparing the initial conditionvalues (e.g., target speed) of autonomous vehicle with the vehiclestatus information that indicates a current status (e.g., current speed)of the autonomous vehicle. At the sending operation 210, the vehiclesimulation computer sends the determined control signal(s) to theautonomous vehicle. After the sending operation 210, the vehiclesimulation computer performs the receiving operation 205 and thedetermining operation 206.

FIG. 3 shows an exemplary flow diagram for testing autonomous vehicleoperations. At the receiving operation 302, a vehicle simulationcomputer receives a pre-configured scenario. The pre-configured scenarioincludes one or more simulation parameters that indicate presence of oneor more simulated objects in an environment that includes an autonomousvehicle, and one or more initial condition parameters that indicate anoperative condition in which the autonomous vehicle is to be operatedwhen a simulation is performed to test the autonomous vehicle.

At the sending operation 304, the vehicle simulation computer sends, tothe autonomous vehicle and based on the one or more initial conditionparameters, control signals that instruct the autonomous vehicle tooperate at the operative condition.

At the determining operation 306, the vehicle simulation computerdetermines that the autonomous vehicle is operating at the operativecondition and then performs operations 308 to 312. At the performingoperation 308, the vehicle simulation computer performs, based on theone or more simulation parameters, the simulation with the one or moresimulated objects and the autonomous vehicle. At the receiving operation310, the vehicle simulation computer receives, from the autonomousvehicle, a status information that indicates a response of theautonomous vehicle to the simulation with one or more simulated objects.At the determining operation 312, the vehicle simulation computerdetermines that the autonomous vehicle passed the simulation based on acomparison of the response of the autonomous vehicle to an expectedresponse of the autonomous vehicle. In some embodiments, when thevehicle simulation computer determines that the autonomous vehicle haspassed (or failed) the simulation, the vehicle simulation computer(e.g., simulation module) can send a message to be displayed on thevehicle simulation computer, where the message indicates that theautonomous vehicle has passed (or failed) the simulation.

In some embodiments, the vehicle simulation computer determines that theautonomous vehicle is operating at the operative condition by:receiving, from the autonomous vehicle, another status information thatindicates a current driving condition of the autonomous vehicle, anddetermining that that the current driving condition is same as theoperative condition. In some embodiments, the method further comprisesthe vehicle simulation computer resending the control signals to theautonomous vehicle in response to determining that the autonomousvehicle is not operating at the operative condition.

In some embodiments, the one or more simulation parameters that indicatepresence of the one or more simulated objects include a first set of oneor more locations of one or more vehicles or a second set of one or morelocations of one or more pedestrians. In some embodiments, the one ormore initial condition parameters include a position, a rotation, aspeed (linear and/or angular), or an acceleration of the autonomousvehicle. In some embodiments, the control signals include a steeringangle that controls an amount of steering of the autonomous vehicle, athrottle value that controls a speed of the autonomous vehicle, a brakevalue to control an amount of braking engaged by the autonomous vehicle,a clutch indication to press or release the clutch of the autonomousvehicle, or a gear shifting information to switch engine gears of theautonomous vehicle. In some embodiments, the autonomous vehicle is asemi-trailer truck.

For cases where the autonomous vehicle is a semi-trailer truck, thesimulation parameters may be designed to test the cab portion separatelyfrom the trailer portion. For example, a same cab may be paired withdifferent trailers and therefore simulations may be performed on usingdifferent combinations of semi (cabs) and trailers. Thus, for example,simulation parameters that indicate a presence of an object designed toveer into a lane occupied by and in front of the semi-trailer truck canbe used to test the response of the cab portion separately from thetrailer portion at least because different trailer lengths can have adifferent response to evasive maneuvering by a cab portion. The responseof the cab portion and the trailer portion can be obtained from theirrespective sensors (e.g., accelerometers).

FIG. 4 shows an exemplary block diagram of a vehicle simulationcomputer. The vehicle simulation computer 400 includes at least oneprocessor 410 and a memory 405 having instructions stored thereupon. Theinstructions upon execution by the processor 410 configure the computer400 to perform the operations described for the various modules, GUI,and/or database as described in FIGS. 1 to 3 and 5 , and/or theoperations described in the various embodiments or sections in thispatent document.

In this document the term “exemplary” is used to mean “an example of”and, unless otherwise stated, does not imply an ideal or a preferredembodiment.

From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments ofthe technical description have been described herein for purposes ofillustration, but that various modifications may be made withoutdeviating from the scope of the technical description. Accordingly, thetechnical description is not limited except as by the appended claims.

Some of the embodiments described herein are described in the generalcontext of methods or processes, which may be implemented in oneembodiment by a computer program product, embodied in acomputer-readable medium, including computer-executable instructions,such as program code, executed by computers in networked environments. Acomputer-readable medium may include removable and non-removable storagedevices including, but not limited to, Read Only Memory (ROM), RandomAccess Memory (RAM), compact discs (CDs), digital versatile discs (DVD),etc. Therefore, the computer-readable media can include a non-transitorystorage media. Generally, program modules may include routines,programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that performparticular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computer-or processor-executable instructions, associated data structures, andprogram modules represent examples of program code for executing stepsof the methods disclosed herein. The particular sequence of suchexecutable instructions or associated data structures representsexamples of corresponding acts for implementing the functions describedin such steps or processes.

Some of the disclosed embodiments can be implemented as devices ormodules using hardware circuits, software, or combinations thereof. Forexample, a hardware circuit implementation can include discrete analogand/or digital components that are, for example, integrated as part of aprinted circuit board. Alternatively, or additionally, the disclosedcomponents or modules can be implemented as an Application SpecificIntegrated Circuit (ASIC) and/or as a Field Programmable Gate Array(FPGA) device. Some implementations may additionally or alternativelyinclude a digital signal processor (DSP) that is a specializedmicroprocessor with an architecture optimized for the operational needsof digital signal processing associated with the disclosedfunctionalities of this application. Similarly, the various componentsor sub-components within each module may be implemented in software,hardware or firmware. The connectivity between the modules and/orcomponents within the modules may be provided using any one of theconnectivity methods and media that is known in the art, including, butnot limited to, communications over the Internet, wired, or wirelessnetworks using the appropriate protocols.

While this document contains many specifics, these should not beconstrued as limitations on the scope of an invention that is claimed orof what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specificto particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in thisdocument in the context of separate embodiments can also be implementedin combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features thatare described in the context of a single embodiment can also beimplemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitablesub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above asacting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, oneor more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excisedfrom the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to asub-combination or a variation of a sub-combination. Similarly, whileoperations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, thisshould not be understood as requiring that such operations be performedin the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that allillustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results.

Only a few implementations and examples are described and otherimplementations, enhancements and variations can be made based on whatis described and illustrated in this disclosure.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of testing autonomous vehicle operation,comprising: receiving, by a computer in an autonomous vehicle, apre-configured scenario that includes: a simulation parameter thatindicates a presence of a simulated object in an environment thatincludes the autonomous vehicle, and initial condition parameters thatindicate an operative condition in which the autonomous vehicle is to beoperated when a simulation is performed to test the autonomous vehicle;sending, by the computer, control signals based on the initial conditionparameters that instruct the autonomous vehicle to operate at theoperative condition; determining, by the computer, that the autonomousvehicle is operating at the operative condition; receiving, by thecomputer, a status information that indicates a response of theautonomous vehicle to the simulation with the simulated object; andcomparing, by the computer, the response of the autonomous vehicle to anexpected response of the autonomous vehicle.
 2. The method of claim 1,wherein the computer determines that the autonomous vehicle is operatingat the operative condition by: receiving, from the autonomous vehicle,another status information that indicates a current driving condition ofthe autonomous vehicle; and determining that that the current drivingcondition is same as the operative condition.
 3. The method of claim 1,further comprising: performing, based on the simulation parameter, thesimulation with the simulated object and the autonomous vehicle.
 4. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the simulation parameter that indicates thepresence of the simulated object includes positions of a simulatedvehicle located and driven around the autonomous vehicle.
 5. The methodof claim 1, wherein the expected response from the autonomous vehicleincludes an expected performance metric or an expected output, whereinthe expected performance metric comprises a range of expected responsevalues provided by the pre-configured scenario.
 6. The method of claim1, wherein the autonomous vehicle has passed the simulation when theresponse of the autonomous vehicle was a correct operation in responseto a simulation performed on the autonomous vehicle, based on comparingthe response of the autonomous vehicle to an expected response of theautonomous vehicle.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the autonomousvehicle is a semi-trailer truck comprising a cab portion and a trailerportion, further wherein the simulation parameters are designed to testthe cab portion separately from the trailer portion.
 8. A non-transitorycomputer readable program storage medium having code stored thereon, thecode, when executed by a processor on an autonomous vehicle, causing theprocessor to implement a method comprising: receiving a pre-configuredscenario that includes: one or more simulation parameters that indicatepresence of one or more simulated objects in an environment thatincludes the autonomous vehicle, and one or more initial conditionparameters that indicate an operative condition in which the autonomousvehicle is to be operated when a simulation is performed to test theautonomous vehicle; sending control signals that instruct the autonomousvehicle to operate at the operative condition; determining that theautonomous vehicle is operating at the operative condition; receiving,from the autonomous vehicle, a status information that indicates aresponse of the autonomous vehicle to the simulation with one or moresimulated objects; and comparing the response of the autonomous vehicleto an expected response of the autonomous vehicle.
 9. The non-transitorycomputer readable program storage medium of claim 8, wherein theautonomous vehicle is determined to operate at the operative conditionby causing the processor to implement the method further comprising:receiving, from the autonomous vehicle, another status information thatindicates a current driving condition of the autonomous vehicle; anddetermining that that the current driving condition is same as theoperative condition.
 10. The non-transitory computer readable programstorage medium of claim 8, wherein the processor is caused to implementthe method further comprising: resending the control signals to theautonomous vehicle in response to determining that the autonomousvehicle is not operating at the operative condition.
 11. Thenon-transitory computer readable program storage medium of claim 8,wherein the processor is caused to implement the method furthercomprising: performing, based on the one or more simulation parameters,the simulation with the one or more simulated objects and the autonomousvehicle.
 12. The non-transitory computer readable program storage mediumof claim 8, wherein the one or more initial condition parameters includea position, a rotation, a speed, or an acceleration of the autonomousvehicle.
 13. The non-transitory computer readable program storage mediumof claim 8, wherein the control signals include a steering angle thatcontrols an amount of steering of the autonomous vehicle, a throttlevalue that controls a speed of the autonomous vehicle, a brake value tocontrol an amount of braking engaged by the autonomous vehicle, a clutchindication to press or release the clutch of the autonomous vehicle, ora gear shifting information to switch engine gears of the autonomousvehicle.
 14. The non-transitory computer readable program storage mediumof claim 8, wherein the autonomous vehicle is a semi-trailer truck. 15.A system for testing autonomous vehicle operation, comprising: anautonomous vehicle; a computer configured to: receive a pre-configuredscenario that includes: one or more simulation parameters that includesan autonomous vehicle, and one or more initial condition parameters thatindicate an operative condition in which the autonomous vehicle is to beoperated when a simulation is performed to test the autonomous vehicle;send control signals that instruct the autonomous vehicle to operate atthe operative condition; determine that the autonomous vehicle isoperating at the operative condition; receive, from the autonomousvehicle, a status information that indicates a response of theautonomous vehicle to the simulation with one or more simulated objects;and compare the response of the autonomous vehicle to an expectedresponse of the autonomous vehicle.
 16. The system of claim 15, whereinthe processor is further configured to: perform, based on the one ormore simulation parameters, the simulation with the one or moresimulated objects and the autonomous vehicle.
 17. The system of claim15, wherein the processor is configured to determine that the autonomousvehicle is operating at the operative condition by having the processorbeing configured to: receive, from the autonomous vehicle, anotherstatus information that indicates a current driving condition of theautonomous vehicle; and determine that that the current drivingcondition is same as the operative condition.
 18. The system of claim15, wherein the processor is further configured to: send a message to bedisplayed on the computer, wherein the message indicates that theautonomous vehicle has passed or failed the simulation.
 19. The systemof claim 15, wherein the one or more simulation parameters include afirst set of one or more locations of one or more vehicles or a secondset of one or more locations of one or more pedestrians.
 20. The systemof claim 15, wherein the one or more initial condition parametersinclude a position, a rotation, a speed, or an acceleration of theautonomous vehicle.